•  
By Wesley Joseph

“Excuse me.  You’re kind of interrupting.”

Ever felt like you were interrupting a conversation?  Feel like you’re butting in?  Maybe you were standing a bit too close to people talking in hushed tones?

Sound familiar?  Yeah, it happens.  And chances are, if you felt that way, you were indeed interrupting!

But that’s not the way it is here! This is a blog!  Jump (or Butt) right in!

You may feel that talking about issues pertaining to sustainability on green blogs is not worth your while, after all, you recycle, use a reusable water bottle, and do a lot of the, “little things,” to be greener. You generally, “care about the environment.” What more

By Wesley Joseph

We’re Back!

It has been a very long hiatus for EnviroHumanImpact.com, and we have undergone many changes in the intermediary.  We regret not having adequate time these last few months to continue with news, tips, and advice our readers can put to good use as they attempt to improve their individual envirohuman impact and to put upward pressure on our political leaders to make changes for the better.

One important change is our new blog theme, which mimics that of TechCrunch, hopefully offering a more clean cut look to the blog and we hope makes more of our recent posts readily available for browsing and reading.  I should note that we don’t want the blog to be identical to their site, but simply find the aesthetics and usability of their site to be favorable for ours, and there really is no comparing the two sites beyond the similar layout.

A New Name: EnviroHumanImpact to Earthascope

Our readers may also notice our new name, Earthascope.com.  The editors of EnviroHumanImpact.com made a conscious decision in this matter to make the name easier to say, remember, and share with others.

We still believe strongly in the concept of an, “envirohuman impact,”

By Wesley Joseph

If you’re trying to follow the envirohuman movement, you should definitely pick up these news stories:

Pickens’ Plan to Profit Off of Public Water

I did not know that Pickens’ plan, which includes a large project of transmission lines to move electricity generated from wind power from rural areas to urban ones, seems to double as a way to move water from what arguably should be considered a public resource.  The water, from a vast underground reservoir, would use the same transmission pathway as the electricity.  Seems we should be careful of what we wish for; even though so many environmentalists, capitalists, and government officials all seem to be in favor of this plan, is it fair for an individual or company to take so much of what belong to the public an make such huge profits off of it?  The same could be asked of oil companies drilling for and profiting off of oil under public lands.

Bloomberg Skyscraper Windmill Plan

I had always wondered about the high altitude created by, among other surfaces, skyscrapers, as points of interest for wind turbines.  Obviously, in the middle of a city, the power generated has more than enough available users, but also, cities have huge overall electricity needs, but relatively little open spaces to put windmills.  Or, do they?  It seems this may be a viable plan for reducing the need for fossil fuel-burning power plants for cities and the transmission lines it might take to move power from open plains into urban areas.


Sunken Ship as Habitat

This is a very interesting concept for me, because while yes, much of this ship is made up of recyclable metals, it also includes some plastics that have concerned scientists familiar with the project for the negative effects of introducing chemicals associated with such plastics into the food chain.  This reminds me of a project that the New York Times detailed months ago, regarding the sinking of spent subway cars into harbors, also for the purpose of becoming marine habitat.  Again in that case, there was concern over the asbestos used in the subway cars, and how it escaping into the ocean might have a negative effect.  Still, the sunken vessel and the subway cars have made for great marine habitat.

By Wesley Joseph

Since we’re discussing the environment, it’s important to step back and take a look at some of the aspects of our daily lives that might receive little attention, yet potential changes abound that could have a huge positive envirohuman impact.

So, standardized reusable shipping containers?  Yes.  At your place of work, you likely see hundreds of boxes come in the door, get unpacked, broken down, and sent off as garbage, or, hopefully, shipped out for recycling (or maybe you don’t see them, but they’re there).

Let’s take, boxes of printer paper, for example.  We all likely do some printing or copying in our everyday lives, or at least use paper that someone has printed information onto in our meetings and correspondence.  Billions if not trillions of sheets are printed daily.  Boxes, like those at the left, are used to ship that paper to our place of work, and, once unpacked, most of them make their way to the dock of the building in which we work, again, hopefully at least for recycling.

Recycling is a good way to continue the lifecycle of usable material, but it is highly energy- and cost-intensive for the very reasons of shipping, water use, and chemical, manual, and mechancial processes that all go into continuing the cycle of that product material, like the paper fibers used in cardboard boxes.  A better recycling process is one in which the material is reused again and again, hundreds, if not thousands of times before it gets sent off for recycling in which it gets broken down into its raw materials for future reproduction of new materials and goods.

What the heck am I talking about?  At your place of work, you likely receive a good deal of mail, which, hopefully gets recycled when you’re finished reading it.  But have you noticed the bins that the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), the United Parcel Service (UPS), and Federal Express (FedEx) use to bring your mail?  It’s usually a plastic-, angle-sided, open-ended container with metal reinforcements, that make these containers so reusable.

You might also receive beverages, like bottled water and sodas, that might be shipped in reusable hard plastic trays, like those here from Pepsi-Cola, that also can be reused many times before needed to be broken down again for recycling.  Although I recommend you choose a better beverage option: water, served from a reusable water bottle, these trays prove that shipping materials can be made to withstand repeated use, abuse, sliding and slamming all over the country (and world!) and that disposable, one-use shipping containers need to become a rarity.

Inter-office mail systems often reuse envelopes within a building several times before discarding them, which goes to show that there are many ways in which we have built the idea of “reusability” into our daily habits.  That’s something we need to take to the next level and push toward doing on an even larger scale.

On and off of postal and parcel trucks, beverage trucks, and others, we receive shipments of items from both reusable and those deemed throwaway, one-use packages.  But back to those boxes of printer paper.

Printer paper typically is packaged in reams of 500 pages, wrapped in paper, and placed ten to a box.  Because large businesses (and small ones, too) use so much paper, this results in millions of boxes being used for the purpose of packaging paper (only one of very many items packaged in this way) and then being tossed shortly thereafter.  Why not mimmick the boxes used by our postal deliverers?

We could have plastic ones made from recycled plastic product with straight sides, metal reinforcements, and a corresponding lid that would cover the box (just like the cardboard ones have).  In this manner, the boxes could be picked back up by those delivering the paper, be it OfficeMax or others.  The point is that reusable packaging for such industrial products, where the packaging does not even matter to the consumer, are a great place to start with reusable packaging.  USPS and Pepsi are already doing it, now how about others?

Certainly, the boxes may weight slightly more than the cardboard, however the fact that they are reusable will be a net monetary savings to the companies using them, and a net savings to the environment as our methods of shipping move toward clean, renewable fuel sources of the next decade or two.  Also, the fact that less paper will be used on packaging boxes would be even more helpful.

By Matthew Philip

I recently Stumbled Upon a site that has to be one of the most comprehensive and useful sites I have found in a very long time.  The site you ask?  It’s called Build It Solar and it is an incredible resource for Do-It-Yourself Solar and other alternative energy based projects and ideas.

There’s literally so much at Build It Solar that I don’t know where to begin.  First, there are literally hundreds of Do-It-Yourself green projects from solar homes and bio-fuels to lighting, cooking, cooling, and heating!  One of the first things that caught my eye was their “Half” Program.

What is Build It Solar’s “Half” Plan?  Basically, it is a program for cutting your energy use, energy cost, and CO2 emissions in half!  In their own words:

We used the Half Plan to cut our total energy use, energy costs, and greenhouse gas emissions in half (and then some).

We cut our energy use from 95,000 KWH per year to 36,000 KWH per — this is saving us $4,800 per year in energy costs, and has reduced our CO2 emissions by 18 tons.

They detail pretty extensively how they achieved this and how for others to follow in their footsteps.  It has also received critical acclaim from various Green websites and magazines such as Home Power Magazine.

Finally, this site is a detailed resource on overall design elements and tools needed to pull of any of the green projects.  You’ll find comprehensive technical solar analysis, material properties, government incentives, and many potential suppliers of materials for any of the projects.

To sum it up, if you’re looking for ways to reduce your carbon footprint, save money, or start a fun weekend or summer-long project, Build It Solar is there to help make it happen!

By Matthew Philip
This entry is part 1 of 2 in the series Cirque du Vert

EnviroHumanImpact is incredibly excited to introduce it’s newest series and blog carnival: Cirque du Vert.

Is that English? Well, first of all, it’s French and while we don’t typically use French on EHI, we thought it appropriate to name our blog carnival in line with other prominent theatrical acts such as Cirque du Soleil (so pardon our French).  If you haven’t stayed up on your French since high school, “Cirque du Vert” basically translates to “Circus of the Green.”  So in other words, a carnival of green ideas and environmental topics.  Not to mention, we believe you’ll find Cirque du Vert to be a “premium” blog carnival, much the same as the Cirque du Soleil shows are premium theatrical or circus acts.

But wait, about the “blog carnival,” what is it? Well, according to Blog Carnival, it is:

A particular kind of blog community. There are many kinds of blogs, and they contain articles on many kinds of topics. Blog Carnivals typically collect together links pointing to blog articles on a particular topic. A Blog Carnival is like a magazine. It has a title, a topic, editors, contributors, and an audience. Editions of the carnival typically come out on a regular basis (e.g. every monday, or on the first of the month). Each edition is a special blog article that consists of links to all the contributions that have been submitted, often with the editors opinions or remarks.

Now that you know what a blog carnival is, what can you expect from Cirque du Vert? Cirque du Vert will be hosted by EnviroHumanImpact every other Friday and brings an “enviro-copia” of blog entries, focusing on the main relationship between human actions affecting the environment and the way the environment in turn affects humans. We’re looking for the best posts on everything from “Going green” tips and environmental news to recycling, conservation, and gardening. If you have a quality, original, green or environmental post on your blog, we want to see it!

Submission Guidelines: Each bi-weekly edition will focus on a unique topic concerning “green” or environmental topics (i.e. Recycling, Green Tips, Pollution, etc.).  The first edition is scheduled for Friday, July 25th, 2008 and is open to all environmental topics.  If you’re interested in submitting a post for this or any future edition you can do so via our Submission Form at BlogCarnival.com.

You can help make this a success! Consider this your chance to be heard and become a more active participant in the EnviroHumanImpact community.   Comment below if you have any questions and we’ll see you in two weeks!

By Wesley Joseph

I face this question whenever I bring up blogging about the environment as well as other, similar, “so what?” questions about bothering to recycle even one sheet of paper.

I like this question because it gives me an opening to discuss habits, psychology, and the responsibility included in our daily practices.

The only drawback of this question is people feeling like you are patting yourself on the back or being a little too proud of being a do-gooder.  In fact, I get that reaction often if the subject comes up (Example interaction: Q: “Why are you using a reusable metal water bottle?  A: Because it’s healthier for me and for the environment.  Q: “So you’re saying that my using of disposables is bad for the environment?  I recycle!)  People can feel as if you’re making a judgmental statement even when you’re in fact just answering a question about a choice you have made.

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 1 of 1 in the series "Fund"amentally Environmental

I am pleased to announce a new series here on EnviroHumanImpact.com.  “‘Fund’amentally Enviromental,” will focus on companies, groups, and associations with a fundamental commitment to either better, more sustainable practices and/or products and some that focus on the environment itself.

Readers of the “Fund”amentally Environmental Series can expect to get outlines of what a company or non-profit aims to do and to be informed of companies that you might consider investing in or groups to which you might want to make a (tax-deductible) donation.

By Wesley Joseph

We reported a story not long ago about how drivers are driving less than they were last year, due much to the higher cost of fuel. Now, with a barrel of oil costing almost $140, gas prices are unlikely to go down. And along with it, expect skyrocketing costs of energy in general, as well as products that use a lot of oil in their production.  Transporting merchandise is not getting cheaper, either.

What does this mean for the average American consumer? Well, for those of us who haven’t already begun making the metamorphisis to a greener lifestyle, that change may be coming by force, rather than by choice. When you’re short on money, extravagance has a way of changing to a more frugal and environmentally sound lifestyle.  This should be a great chance for U.S. consumers to change some bad habits, but if you are not careful, it might happen to you by force instead of choice.

Eager to stay ahead of that force?

By Matthew Philip

I’ve been a dog person my entire entire life having had many different breeds both large and small. Recently, my wife and I adopted a beautiful little miniature dachshund (that’s right a Wiener dog!) named Mia. Now, granted, having a pet is not the most environmentally friendly choice, but they are enjoyable and so many people have pets, we should talk about a small way to reduce the negatives impacts of that ownership.

After nearly 3 months have passed since Mia entered the family, I came to a few realizations about the benefits of small dog ownership both for the owner and the environment: