Warning: sem_get() [function.sem-get]: failed for key 0x152b: Permission denied in /home1/jepplinm/public_html/envirohumanimpact/wp-content/plugins/wp-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 98
Health | Earthascope
  •  
By Wesley Joseph

One of the most oft recommended ways to reduce your energy consumption is to begin using compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs.  We have recommended this purchase both in the Greener Under Twenty and in the Green Life Project series.  

Many will bring up that the bulbs contain mercury, which is true.  However, they can be recycled at more and more places, including Home Depot stores.  And even if they don’t make it to the recycling center, which is bad, because they should go there, there is still less mercury being emitted by coal-fired power plants due each bulb replacing a less efficient incandescent bulb.

So, they’re much more efficient and can be recycled, taking away that mercury complaint, which makes this seem as if it might be a no-brainer.  Not so fast.  It’s not so simple!

Light emitting diodes (LEDs) have been touted recently as another contender for replacing our lights.  They are even more efficient than CFL bulbs, however are much more expensive than CFLs which are usually more expensive than incandescent bulbs.

Plus, Matthew Phillips sent me this story from the Times of London (‘Green’ Lightbulbs Poison Workers) last week, which highlights workers being poisoned due to working with the mercury in the bulbs in factories in China.  

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 11 of 11 in the series Green Life Project

 

Your detergent doesn't have to be sickly blue like this one!  Make the switch to something more natural!

Your detergent doesn't have to be sickly blue like this one! Make the switch to something more natural!

Green Life Project is a weekly series of posts highlighting one change for readers to make in their life in order to gradually green their lives.

||Week Nine||

This week’s Green Life Project action item is to purchase a green laundry detergent.

 

Green Life Project is into full swing and if you’re following along, I hope that you’re implementing these changes on a week-by-week basis, taking advantage of a gradual process our articles are meant to guide you through toward a more sustainable life.

And we’re focusing mostly on very simple choices you can make — many of them done at the grocery store, where it’s an easy difference in decision.

What’s next up for us?  Well, we’ve concentrated so far mostly on consuming less, consuming smarter, and making less waste.  So for example, using a metal water bottle will cut down on the amount of waste you produce (or that produced on your behalf) and using recycled paper toilet paper helps reduce the number of trees that get cut down, processed, and used for your dirty deeds.

Similar to when we recommended a switch to a greener dish soap, now we’re recommending that you change to a more sustainable laundry detergent.  The guidelines for choosing a greener laundry detergent are similar to those we used for a more sustainable dish soap.  Back then, I had this to say:

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 6 of 11 in the series Green Life Project
1135769_bubbles

You don't have to sacrifice your suds when you switch to a greener dish soap!

Green Life Project is a weekly series of posts highlighting one change for readers to make in their life in order to gradually green their lives.

||Week Four||

This week’s Green Life Project action item is to purchase a green dish soap. This is yet another simple step toward a more sustainable you!

Where to start? Here are some broad, basic guidelines to use for a greener dish soap:

  1. First, try to get a dye-free, frangrance-free soap.
  2. Second, attempt to find a dish soap with plant-based surfactants, such as coconut-based ones.
  3. A third, related item to look for
By Wesley Joseph

Be sure to keep baking soda on the shelf at all times!  Why?  Beside the fact that it is an ingredient in many recipes, it is an environmentally-safe, healthy alternative with many functions.

Here are a four basic tasks for which you can use baking soda:

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 11 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Product Reviewed: 365 Organics Organic Cotton Balls

Place of Purchase: Whole Foods Market

Purchase Price: $2.99 for 100 jumbo cotton balls

Product replaced: Non-organic cotton balls

Ingredients: 100% organic cotton

Use: I use them for cosmetic or first-aid uses, such as applying facial toner or alcohol, when needed.

Results: These are great!  They’re affordable and very soft!  The package says that,

Organic farming helps replenish the soil and protect the quality of our water and air.  Cotton grown without the use of harsh chemicals means cotton balls that are naturally free of harmful chemical residue.  Whitened with hydrogen peroxide, our cotton balls are gentle and absorbent, with a velvety, soft texture that feels wonderful on your skin.

I hate to take a manufacturer’s word for what I can expect, because of the obvious fact that they’re trying to sell you the product.  But what they have to say seems all too true, especially how soft the cotton really is, and the fact that the 365 Organics Cotton Balls are so very large — not the case with many other cotton balls.  Sometimes, I tear them in half because it feels wasteful to use so much cotton, and they are still bigger when torn in half than many of their competitors’ are at full size.

Best of all: Mostly, they’re organic, soft, absorbent, and affordable.  Simply put.

Why try it? Because all you have to do is head to a Whole Foods Market near you and pick them up.  If you don’t live near a Whole Foods market, search out your local natural foods and products store for organic cotton balls, and other products. 

The drawback: As noted above, these cotton balls are big, which is great from a utilitarian perspective, but 365 Organics would do well to cut down the size by one half.  That would put them at about an average standard size and would eliminate waste; as is, there is almost too much cotton in each cotton ball.

EHI There! What green products are you using that you love? What products are you trying to replace? Got an idea for a product you would like to be reviewed? We welcome guest columnists; just contact us!

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 3 of 4 in the series Green News Blurb

Environmental news you may not have heard during the week:


Toxins Rules

Political appointees in the Department of Labor are trying to push through a rule that would make it more difficult to regulate workers’ exposure to on-site chemicals.  As if the Bush Administration hasn’t done enough to undermine the environment and workers’ health and safety, one last feather in the hat for the road!


Direct Mail Going Green?

Group of direct mail marketers and their clients are trying to make what amounts to an unsustainable practice a little greener by using chlorine-free recycled paper and purging their lists of the names of both dead people and those least likely to respond.


More on the Value of An American Life

We touched on this story last week, that the value that the EPA places on an American’s life has gone down significantly recently, meaning that regulations that protect human life will more often be deemed more expensive than they are worth.  Carl Pope, the Executive Director of the Sierra Club, gives even more background information on this important subject.


L.A. Bans Plastic Bags: 2010

Los Angeles’ city council voted to ban plastic bags beginning in 2010.  Shoppers will then have to bring their own bags or pay a $0.25 fee per paper or biodegradable bag they use.  The city estimates that 2 billion plastic bags are used in Los Angeles each year.


Arctic Has Large Amount of Oil

The National Geological Survey released a report this week saying that the Arctic may contain as much as one fifth of the world’s yet-to-be-discoverd oil and natural gas reserves.  More on this story in an upcoming article, availabe here on EnviroHumanImpact later this week.


By Matthew Philip
This entry is part 2 of 2 in the series Cirque du Vert

Welcome to the July 25, 2008 edition of Cirque du Vert!  We are excited to introduce the first edition of our resident Blog Carnival, Cirque du Vert. For more information on the carnival, check out the series’ homepage: Cirque du Vert.

John presents Coal vs. Wind in Appalachia posted at A DC Birding Blog.  John discusses recent debate over wind farms vs. coal mines for energy in the Appalachian mountains.  He also details some of the negative impacts on area wildlife of the otherwise clean energy source.  Do the benefits of wind in the area outweigh the drawbacks?  Find out what he thinks and more!

AutoMediaSolutions presents 100 MPG SUV posted at Automedia.com — Automotive advice you can trust, saying, “100-MPG SUV. A new joint venture to develop an ultra-frugal full-size SUV, touts partnership with major automaker. Can it be done?”

Automotive Traveler presents Automotive Traveler – From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank, Part Two posted at Automotive Traveler – Where every drive is an adventure, saying, “Last week, after reading Joshua Tickell’s book From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank, I became intrigued about the prospect of buying a Mercedes-Benz diesel and running it on biodiesel or even straight vegetable oil.”

Naomi presents Dancers Generate Electricity at London’s First Eco Nightclub posted at Diary From England, saying, “Thought you might find this post interesting. Good luck with your carnival!”  Editors Note:  We also recently covered this story on EHI but Naomi brings another perspective and story on the topic.

GrrlScientist presents Sizzle: A Global Warming Comedy posted at Living the Scientific Life, saying, “a film about global warming by Randy Olson, this film fails miserably to blend humor and science into an entertaining and educational experience”  Check out this review on the upcoming film and why the author gave some negative reviews.

Fiona Lohrenz presents Going Organic…Why We Should! posted at Child Care Only.  Fiona brings us an article outlining the benefits to the environment and our bodies of going to an organic diet.

Stephanie Bryant presents Ant Attack: Getting rid of ants without pesticides posted at U.S. Travel.  Here’s a great tip for natural and home insect control remedies.

That concludes this edition. Submit your blog article to the next edition of Cirque du Vert – Circus of the Green using our carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.

Technorati tags: , .

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 1 of 4 in the series Green News Blurb

“Weekly Green News Blurb | You Should Know,” is our newest series that we plan to publish each week on Sunday so you can come to work Monday and catch up on all your needed environmental news — the biggest stories you may have missed last week because the mainstream media drones on about celebrity arrests or is still talking about the latest missing person.  Yeah, that’s a jab at sensational journalism!

If you want sensational journalism, we have a real sensation for you right here.  Let’s go!


The Life of An American is Worth Less Now

The “value of a statistical life” is worth about $1 million less than it was about five years ago.  It has dropped to $6.9 million, according to the EPA.  Important for environmental regulation: When writing regulations (such as those made on pollution), the comparison of the cost of human life that may be spared by it and the cost of the regulation is compared, and if the cost of regulation is more, it’s unlikely that the regulation will be made.


Georgia Judge Blocks Coal-Fired Power Plant

A Superior Court Judge in Georgia stopped construction of a coal-fired power plants because the plant must limit its carbon dioxide emissions.  Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore delivered the decision against Dynegy’s Longleaf power plant near Columbus, based on an April 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide is a pollutant under the federal Clean Air Act.  The plant had planned to emit 9 million tons of carbon dioxide annually, about equal to adding 1.3 million cars on the road.  Cheers to this decision!


Chemical Weapons Destruction is Behind on Schedule

The Pentagon is considering moving chemical weapons to military sites in four states, prompting outcry from many legislators whose states would have weapons travelling through them if the plan were to move forward.  The move is to comply with a 1997 Treaty banning chemical weapons; Congress has declared that the U.S. should be in compliance by 2017.  Fears of the munitions facing traffic accidents or becoming terrorist targets has raised fears chiefly for the safety of the residents of those areas, and might I add the environmental degradation that could make those areas uninhabitable potentially for years to come.  Ribble Rabble Ribble Rabble.


Ex-Aide Says Cheney’s Office had Portions of EPA Report Deleted

Fearing that references to global warming gases as threats to human health, Cheney’s Office reportedly had such reference removed from a report made to Congress because it would make avoiding regulating greenhouse gases more difficult.  Who’s surprised?  Rabble-rabble!


Are compact fluorescent bulbs still a bright idea?

The Chicago Tribune gets it wrong on this one, pointing out that “there aren’t many recycling centers available. At some county hazardous waste collection sites you have to pay about $1 per bulb to recycle CFLs,” while omitting the fact that Home Depot is offering CFL bulb recycling for free at all of its approximately 1,000 U.S. stores.  There were exaggerations in the story regarding how long it takes for the bulbs to warm up and that the light is of low-quality, even though the bulbs have come a long way and most models produce a similar light to that produced by the incandescent bulbs they replace.

The article overemphasizes the fact that CFL bulbs contain mercury while ignoring the fact that the net effect is less emitted mercury from power plants because of the use of these bulbs reducing the need for power production — and that coupled with the fact that they can now be recycled for free at Home Depot stores means much less mercury being released into our environment.  The overarching story here is that CFL bulbs are both an eco-friendly option and a way to save money — now even more true with the free recycling option at Home Depot stores.


That’s this week’s Green News Blurb! See you next Monday with another week’s worth of the news that you may not have picked up in the papers or from your cable news.  Let us know what you think about the stories posted above in our comments section found below.

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 8 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Check out Green Life Project: Purchase Metal Water Bottle

As the average American consumer has moved from drinking so much soda on-the-go to drinking more water, a new problem has emerged: what is to be done with all of the water bottles, once theya re empty?  Well, recycling is one option, although the process of making and recycling bottles (as well as transporting full bottles from factory to user) is highly energy- and fossil fuel-intensive, as well, so many have found another viable option.

How have consumers reacted to the negative environmental effects of rampant one-use bottle use? They have adapted and bought in droves different reusable bottles for refilling in their homes.  Many users choose to use a filter and bottle their own water daily and tote it along with them.  A reusable bottle tends to cost between $6 and $20, depending upon size and brand, so pretty quickly, the initial purchase of the reusable bottle is recouped because the user is no longer buying large cases of water at the store or using vending machines for water needs.  But are reusable plastic bottles safe?

So, is there a lingering danger in all of this? Well, while new bottles are available now, most Nalgene bottles were originally a polycarbonate blend of plastics and polymers.  Ever used a Nalgene reusable water bottle?  I have.  I received one years ago from my University as a gift for some volunteer work and have a new one sitting on my shelf.  Originally, it was great to have and I loved it.  I brought my water with me to class and after graduating, still used it for daily water needs.  These typically run from $8 to $15, depending upon shape and size and place of purchase.

Something smelled amiss. I admit, when I first received my bottle, I smelled the plastic smell, and it worried me.  I washed the bottle thoroughly, believing that I could wash away whatever chemicals might be present.  It concerned me that perhaps a chemical, or several chemicals in my polycarbonate bottle might leak into my water and be carcinogenic.  I continued to use my bottle, even though the smell would come back after the bottle was closed and when you smell a new Nalgene on the shelf of a store, the smell from inside should be a warning to consumers that something is amiss.  I enjoyed using the bottle, though, because it was reusable and it seemed everyone had one — all of us gleefully poisoning ourselves.

Nalgene hits the news (not in a good way). When I saw a story in late 2007 saying that certain stores in Canada were removing the bottles from their stores’ shelves, because of strong concerns about the leaching of endocrine interrupters into water, specifically, bisphenol-A (BPA), which is considered, “toxic,” to humans, I decided to never use my Nalgene bottle for water consumption again.  As recently as April 18, 2008, Wal-Mart decided to remove all baby bottles and Nalgene water bottles containing BPA in both the U.S. and Canada!

While Nalgene now sells polyethylene versions of their products (softer, and less durable than the hard polycarbonate ones), I still am not buying.  Increasingly, studies show that foods stored in plastic or those cooked in or with plastic, are showing signs of chemical residues from those materials, and it never seems to be good news, always seems to be warning of carcinogenic properties (think about melted plastic wrap covering your microwaved foods, for example — hint: use bleach-free waxed paper or a paper towel).

Back to the positive envirohuman impact of using Nalgene bottles: Yes, a Nalgene polycarbonate bottle is “green,” in the sense that it is highly durable, lightweight, reusable, and recyclable.  It reduces peoples’ need for bottles of water shipped from far away places (by trucks and boats using such fuels as diesel and other oil-derived fuels) only to have the containers either thrown away or shipped back off to an energy-intensive recycling process.

The reason I recommend you do not use Nalgene or other plastic bottles: They leach chemicals.  Bisphenol-A has been found to be toxic to humans.  Even for those plastic bottles made of other materials, I am still leary of the potential effects of having my food products in contact with plastic, because research continues to show that chemicals can leach from plastics into what we eat.  Those chemicals are not organic and are potentially toxic, as is the case with Bisphenol-A.  I would rather not take my chances.

There are popular alternatives to Nalgene bottles: Nalgene vs. Sigg Water Bottles. As an aside, my older brother had actually carried a (Switzerland-based) Sigg water bottle, which is a decoratively painted aluminum bottle, lined with brass (and I later found out, lined also with an epoxy).  He had lightly promoted the bottle when he visited, but I had not taken too much more interest than noticing its chic design.

I bought my own Sigg water bottle at Whole Foods for about $20, and though I have my reservations about the epoxy lining, I feel safer knowing that laboratory studies say that there is zero leaching from Sigg bottles, whereas lab studies show much leaching from Nalgene’s polycarbonate water bottles.

I should try to find a bottle that is not epoxy-lined, either.  My Sigg water bottle has such a liner, and though the company is not revealing the proprietary blend of chemicals used, they continue to say that there is no leaching of dangerous chemicals.

CEO of Sigg, Steve Wasik, said on treehugger, “very thorough migration testing in laboratories around the world is conducted regularly and has consistently shown SIGG aluminum bottles to have no presence of lead, phthalates, Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), Bysphenol A (BPA), Bysphenol B (BPB) or any other chemicals which scientists have deemed as potentially harmful.”

Nalgene has responded to concerns over BPA. While Nalgene says on its site that it is now using, “Tritan” plastic, which is supposed to be BPA-free, who is to say that it is safe for humans?  It is yet another unproven plastic, and much caution is needed when humans are using plastic to store foods and beverages, like water.  At least Nalgene says that it is phasing out its BPA-leaching plastic products, and they are introducing stainless steel options, alongside several plastic ones.

Remember, our objects have an end-of-life.  The polycarbonate bottles of millions of customers will someday either be recycled or thrown away.  I can’t help but feel that the fewer plastics we have to deal with, overall, the better, not because metals are all that much easier to deal with, but simply because plastics seem to be more toxic to our environment and its inhabitants.  Generally, the smaller the concentration of plastics, the better, it seems.

EnviroHumanImpact gives Nalgene plastic bottles of all types, especially the polycarbonate ones, a negative envirohuman impact rating, because of the direct negative impact on human health and potential diseases from the chemicals leached from the bottles into users’ water cancels out the potential environmental savings from the use of a reusable bottle.  There are other, healthier reusuable water bottle options, like stainless steel, glass, or perhaps Sigg water bottles.

Hi!  Tell us what kind of water bottle you use, why you use it, and what concerns you have about water bottles!

By Wesley Joseph

Product Reviewed: Method Dish Soap (Naturally Derived – Ultra Concentrated) “Go Naked”

Place of Purchase: Whole Foods

Purchase Price: $3.00 – $4.00

Product replaced: Petroleum-based dish soaps, specifically for me, Palmolive (I quit using Palmolive more than a year ago and have since been testing several plant-based soaps).

Ingredients: Blend of naturally derived and biodegradable surfactants, corn alcohol, table salt, citric acid, aloe vera gel, vitamin E, Preservative (under 0.1%), purified water

Use: I have used this product for washing dishes and for wiping down counters in my kitchen.

Results: Good, natural dish soap, which foams nicely and has basically no