Warning: sem_get() [function.sem-get]: failed for key 0x152b: Permission denied in /home1/jepplinm/public_html/envirohumanimpact/wp-content/plugins/wp-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 98
Technology | Earthascope
  •  
By Matthew Philip

Ok, so I wanted an excuse to post a video of robotic penguins swimming and flying (below) through the air. The video was just too cool, but hear me out!

Festo, the company behind the robotic swimming and flying penguins, has recently unveiled their newest engineering marvel as part of the Bionic Learning Network. What really got me thinking was the BLN mission statement:

Maximum performance with minimum energy consumption: Nature shows the way to energy-efficient movement processes in tomorrow’s production and provides impulses for astounding new practical applications.

The key is in the first line:

By Wesley Joseph

I wanted to bring to readers’ attention a new vehicle that might revolutionize travel in cities. The PUMA! You’ve probably already heard about this by now. The concept seems on the surface to be a rather brilliant attempt at tackling the smog and congestion problems posed by motor vehicles.

General Motors (GM), known for making such gas guzzlers as the Humvee (Hummer and H2), has teamed up with two-wheeled personal transporters, Segway, to produce the PUMA, a vehicle focused on, “Personal Urban Mobility and Accessiblity.

It’s great to see GM move away from over-sized vehicles.  Also, SegWay, whose product has, to me, seemed to have held such promise for a long time but not the results to match, to have maybe found a way forward into massive implementation of their technology.

Check out this video:

By Wesley Joseph

Small plastic garbage?  Each month, more than 45 tons of CDs become obsolete—outdated, useless, or unwanted.  What to do with them and their cases?

Small plastic garbage? Each month, more than 45 tons of CDs become obsolete—outdated, useless, or unwanted. What to do with them and their cases?

I just received an email with the following questions regarding recycling CDs and their cases:

How would I recycle plastic CD cases?  Can I just chuck the whole CD into the recycling bin?

Admittedly, I didn’t know the answer and needed to do some research.  After wading through some how-to crafts, I found the answer I was looking for.  Read on!

How would I recycle CD plastic covers?

Beyond, “I don’t know,” my first reaction to this question was that, sure, as the second question implies, you can put them into your general recycling bin and send them off with whatever cans, bottles, and paper you put by the curb or deliver to a recycling center.

However, I was skeptical of this actually working, because I could not find a recycling symbol and plastic type labeled on my jewel CD cases.

So, while some might have such a symbol, some do not.  I’m concerned that

By Matthew Philip

In my endless browsing of the internet, tonight I came across one of the coolest things I’ve seen in quite a while. It comes to us from our friends(?) at General Electric. You’ve probably seen their ads on TV over the past year or so pushing the Ecomagination campaign, which are pretty slick.

Now I’ll leave the debate open for another future post on whether or not GE really is pushing forward with greener energy options, but in the meantime check out Plug Into the Smart Grid, where you can use your webcam to create an incredibly cool holographic image on the screen. I just hope GE is putting as much energy into greening themselves as they are making cool internet tricks!

For a quick preview, check out the YouTube clip below! By the way, I tried it and it really does work just like the video!

By Matthew Philip

Welcome to the August 22, 2008 edition of Cirque du Vert: Circus of the Green! Thank you for all of the submissions, unfortunately this will be a shortened edition due to BlogCarnival.com being down the last couple of days, preventing more submissions from being accepted.  Look for CdV to return to its normal form with Volume 4 in 2 weeks!

Wesley Joseph presents Once you go Black, you might still go Back… to Google posted at EnviroHumanImpact.  He says “There’s been a lot of debate concerning ways to reduce the carbon footprints of our PCs.  We take a “Mythbusters” approach to finding out if you really can save energy by using websites with black backgrounds.  We also look at some other ways to save energy and money while using your computer.”

Louise Manning presents How sustainable is the global food supply model? posted at The Human Imprint.  Louise discusses the long term viability of the global food chain, specifically looking at the poultry supply chain model which has been under growing pressure lately due to rising grain costs.  Check out her extensive article and paper on the topic.

Ena Clewes presents Dealing With Garden Pests the Organic Way posted at Organic Gardening. Ena has a great article on organic gardening.  She details ways to lower your consumption (read: use) of insect repellants and eliminate harsh insecticides. Probably best of all, she gives multiple recipes for making your own home-made bug sprays (to kill bugs) and pest repellents (for keeping them away in the first place).

AdmirableIndia.com presents Lalbagh Botanical Garden, Bangalore: Part 1: Ancient Watch Tower and Organic Cultivation posted at AdmirableIndia.com.  Finally, this is a neat little article with pictures of a Botanical garden in India that is partially dedicated to organic cultivation!

That concludes this edition.  Submit your blog article to the next edition of Cirque du Vert: Circus of the Green using our carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.

By Wesley Joseph

Use the outside air to refrigerate our foods?

We hear it all the time about how much energy our refrigerators use, especially if using an older model.  But little attention seems to be given to the fact that we put refrigerators into buildings that, in the winter time, are heated, even though there is free cold air outside.  Some climates even have cold temperatures year round and could really take advantage of the cold air.

No, I’m not saying that we should store our cold items outside during cold months: much of it would freeze that is supposed to stay at refrigerator temperatures (aside from myriad other complications that need not be listed here).  But I am suggesting that we can and should take advantage of cold temperatures nationwide.

How do we do that?

Well, somewhere, whether built into a wall, a cabinet, or in a basement or utility closet area, an insulated chamber would be allowed to monitor and draw cold air from outside as needed.  The air could be pumped into the unit with a fan, filtered as it enters the home, mixed with indoor air or slowly released into the refrigerator or freezer in small quantities (the air would be piped into the unit) with the use of a thermostat controlling temperature so as to make sure correct optimal temperatures are maintained.

A thermostat would also be set to stop accepting air from the outside when it would be detrimental (meaning, too high of a temperature) to the operation of the refrigerator or freezer.  The refrigerator or freezer unit’s compressor could then seamlessly kick back into gear to keep the temperature optimal.  In this way, users would not have to watch for unexpectedly warm days or for change-of-season days with large temperature swings.

“But no one is going to go to that much trouble to save a few bucks on refrigerator operating expenses…”

Oh no?  What about icemakers in our freezers?  Those have grown to the point that the plumbing now comes almost standard in most homes, because it saves people so much time from filling and emptying ice cube trays and the frustrations of running out of ice.  The convenience is great!  But how much of a niche product and plumbing offering was that when it first launched?  Yeah, and now it’s pretty much standard.

If you tell people that for a few hundred dollars they can greatly increase the efficiency of their refrigerators and improve their envirohuman impacts, some certainly would do so.  It would become even cheaper as these units and the necessary infrastructure could be built into new and renovated homes.   Refrigerators could come standard with plugged openings that could be employed for such uses, much as they now do with ice maker capabilities.

It was not so long ago that refrigerators did not have ice maker potential built into the units and slowly it became the norm because homeowners had the ability built into their homes.  Many come with the ability to add an icemaker unit, and the same type of “add-it-if-you-want” option could be used initially for this technology.

Just imagine how cheap the feature could be if the refrigerators had a small chamber added onto the unit near the bottom or on the back of the unit for such operation.  All you would need is a pipe nearby that had access to the outside with a built-in fan and filter, and you would be in business.

Homeowners choose such options all the time: think about not only the ice makers most people now use, but also units to remove radon gas from basements.  They are increasingly choosing solar electric or water heating systems, as well as other greener options, that are often costly upfront but eventually payoff both financially and environmentally.  Wind turbines are becoming more common on peoples’ roofs and properties, and a box on the back of a refrigerator would seem like nothing to that type of consumer.

How about commercial refrigeration?

Yes, think about all of the meatpacking and cold products industries, not to mention restaurants and grocery stores, that use huge industrial refrigeration units for keeping large quantities of foods cold.  Wow, what a savings for both the country and those businesses, in terms of pollution, energy, and cost savings!  Yes, it depends upon the climate and the time of year, but for many businesses, this may be yet another way to cut costs by improving their envirohuman impacts.

Now, if we could just get a major appliance manufacturer to put the same genius marketing behind that which launched that time-saving icemaker found in so many homes.

By Matthew Philip

Baby, it don’t matter if you’re black or white” – The Prince of Pop

Debate has raged on (seemingly for years now) as to whether or not switching to websites utilizing black backgrounds makes a real and significant difference in power consumption of computer monitors.  Proponents such as Blackle claim that if everyone switched to a black version of Google, we could save upwards of 750 Megawatt-hours per year.

So what’s the truth? Do black background websites really make a difference in power consumption?  Well, according to an article and research on Techlogg, the difference is somewhat disappointing.  Basically, they ran a pretty extensive test of 27 different computer monitors of various sizes and brands (including 23 LCD monitors) and found that in most cases, the power consumption difference was pretty negligible (some monitors even consumed more power using the black background Blackle!).

Now in all fairness, when testing standard CRT (Cathode Ray Tube or big, bulky, old tube-television style monitor that takes up my entire desk) monitors, they found that consumption was lowered but by closer to half (7-8 watts) of the 15 watts claimed by Blackle and its sources.

How about a little perspective? Did you know that LCD computer monitors now dominate the world marketplace for computer monitors at over 75%?  If your math is a little shaky, that means that less than 25% of computers worldwide are still using CRT monitors, which means that the 7-8 saved watts of blackness is less significant everyday that someone upgrades to a new LCD monitor.  The results of the Techlogg study were not necessarily surprising to me or probably anyone familiar with how an LCD TV or computer monitor works.

According to Webopedia:

“Short for liquid crystal display, LCD is a type of display that uses two sheets of polarizing material with a liquid crystal solution between them. An electric current passed through the liquid causes the crystals to align so that light cannot pass through them. Each crystal, therefore, is like a shutter, either allowing light to pass through or blocking the light.”

So in other words, when you visit a site with a black background on an LCD monitor, the backlight is still turned on but the “shutters” are closed and screen now black.  I suppose if you still own a CRT monitor you could relish in your 8 watt savings OR you could go out an purchase an LCD monitor and save upwards of 50 watts at all times the monitor is turned on.  That’s right, LCD’s consume about half the energy in the first place compared to CRT monitors!

So the bottom line? If you’re using a CRT monitor, you are saving a pretty small amount of energy on black background sites; however, if you’d upgrade to an LCD monitor, you could be saving between 5-7 times the energy at all times when your monitor is turned on.

How do you make an LCD monitor even more eco-friendly? Try this free and simple method that will tell you just how much power and money you’ll save each year using it!

By Matthew Philip

I recently Stumbled Upon a site that has to be one of the most comprehensive and useful sites I have found in a very long time.  The site you ask?  It’s called Build It Solar and it is an incredible resource for Do-It-Yourself Solar and other alternative energy based projects and ideas.

There’s literally so much at Build It Solar that I don’t know where to begin.  First, there are literally hundreds of Do-It-Yourself green projects from solar homes and bio-fuels to lighting, cooking, cooling, and heating!  One of the first things that caught my eye was their “Half” Program.

What is Build It Solar’s “Half” Plan?  Basically, it is a program for cutting your energy use, energy cost, and CO2 emissions in half!  In their own words:

We used the Half Plan to cut our total energy use, energy costs, and greenhouse gas emissions in half (and then some).

We cut our energy use from 95,000 KWH per year to 36,000 KWH per — this is saving us $4,800 per year in energy costs, and has reduced our CO2 emissions by 18 tons.

They detail pretty extensively how they achieved this and how for others to follow in their footsteps.  It has also received critical acclaim from various Green websites and magazines such as Home Power Magazine.

Finally, this site is a detailed resource on overall design elements and tools needed to pull of any of the green projects.  You’ll find comprehensive technical solar analysis, material properties, government incentives, and many potential suppliers of materials for any of the projects.

To sum it up, if you’re looking for ways to reduce your carbon footprint, save money, or start a fun weekend or summer-long project, Build It Solar is there to help make it happen!

By Wesley Joseph

A quick news story I thought readers might find interesting focused on ecological, and even, yes democratic design.  A designer who has such feats under his belt as designer the 2-Euro coin is now focusing his efforts on more practical design.

The point of the story that was of most interest to me was mention of a rooftop wind turbine.  No, this is not new, but the price range he’s gearing the item to: between $780 to $1,250 for a wind turbine the designer, Philippe Starck, says can produce up to 80% of a home’s energy (invest in two of the turbines, and presumably, you could produce enough for your home, and about half of one of your neighbor’s homes (or sell the extra power back to the grid, more likely).

Another online source said that the turbine could produce 20% to 60% of a home’s energy needs, which seems more likely, when you see the design and know that it is a miniature wind turbine, it seems as if the 80% (I know, it says, “up to”) seems exaggerated.  Yes, you would need more equipment to use the energy, and it would likely take much more expertise than taking it home and installing in fifteen minutes as the designer says, but have to love this concept.

Two amazing features for the wind turbine is its design, the part anyone might see from a distance or below is clear plastic and its price range!  I mean for less than many (if not most) of us pay for a new computer, you could take care of a significant portion of your home power bills and improve your envirohuman impact!

You could probably see a very significant amount of payback for your investment rather quickly, especially since compared to several thousand you might pay for another turbine, these are cheap!  Made with plastic?  I’m not sure how long these might last or how easy it might be to get replacement plastic (how long is the warranty?), but this seems like one to look into if you’re looking for an inexpensive way to get started on greener energy.

By Wesley Joseph

I just read an article about new software, made available for free through Microsoft, the nonprofit Climate Savers Computing Initiative, and Verdiem, a startup.  It sounds great, especially when you look at some of the statistics they provide.

This type of application is extremely valuable to someone trying to improve his envirohuman impact, because the product is free, it saves you electricity (meaning less carbon spewed into our atmosphere), and it saves you money in the process.  Did you know that you could even extend the life of your PC?

The program is called Edison and installation is simple by downloading the program at: Verdiem, Microsoft, or Climate Savers.

If a user sets the software to put the machine in a “deep sleep” mode after a few minutes of not hitting a keystroke, the hard drive powers down and the PC sips just 5 percent of its normal energy consumption.

Even though most would probably give themselves ten or fifteen minutes, this program will let you decide how long, and putting your computer into a deep sleep more quickly or less so is up to you (yes, sleep modes are already available and I’m not sure if standard sleep mode takes the PC down to the same 5 percent).

Also,

Half of all electricity consumed by a standard PC is wasted, according to environmental and industry studies.

And because the software is being provided for free, any of the power savings are, well, free as well.  The article estimates that users could save $20 to $95 per PC per year, and any money in your pocket in a down economy is of course welcome.

Especially for this case, it’s just another simple way that you can improve your envirohuman impact and actually save some money at the same time.  Doing well by doing good, nothing to argue with there!

Read the entire story here.