One of the most oft recommended ways to reduce your energy consumption is to begin using compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs. We have recommended this purchase both in the Greener Under Twenty and in the Green Life Project series.
Many will bring up that the bulbs contain mercury, which is true. However, they can be recycled at more and more places, including Home Depot stores. And even if they don’t make it to the recycling center, which is bad, because they should go there, there is still less mercury being emitted by coal-fired power plants due each bulb replacing a less efficient incandescent bulb.
So, they’re much more efficient and can be recycled, taking away that mercury complaint, which makes this seem as if it might be a no-brainer. Not so fast. It’s not so simple!
Light emitting diodes (LEDs) have been touted recently as another contender for replacing our lights. They are even more efficient than CFL bulbs, however are much more expensive than CFLs which are usually more expensive than incandescent bulbs.
Plus, Matthew Phillips sent me this story from the Times of London (‘Green’ Lightbulbs Poison Workers) last week, which highlights workers being poisoned due to working with the mercury in the bulbs in factories in China.
This was a reminder to me that while we are making great efforts toward a more sustainable, healthier, more productive future, one with hopefully greater environmental justice for everyone, but along the way, we’re bound to make missteps. We have to consider the costs to humans and our environment not only of the item we use itself and its disposal, or hopefully, reuse or recycle, but also that of the raw materials’ extraction and their production. Those are places that may be less in consumers’ minds when they shop, but are extremely important to the impact of supposedly, “greener” purchases.
Here is a classic case of a product that can help us to function more efficiently, can be recycled, but which is not necessarily being produced in a way that is environmentally-safe or healthful for the workers who manufacture it.
Check it out:
A survey of published specialist literature and reports by state media shows hundreds of workers at Chinese-owned factories have been poisoned by mercury over the past decade.
In one case, Foshan city officials intervened to order medical tests on workers at the Nanhai Feiyang lighting factory after receiving a petition alleging dangerous conditions, according to a report in the Nanfang Daily newspaper. The tests found 68 out of 72 workers were so badly poisoned they required hospitalisation.
A specialist medical journal, published by the health ministry, describes another compact fluorescent lightbulb factory in Jinzhou, in central China, where 121 out of 123 employees had excessive mercury levels. One man’s level was 150 times the accepted standard.
The same journal identified a compact fluorescent lightbulb factory in Anyang, eastern China, where 35% of workers suffered mercury poisoning, and industrial discharge containing the toxin went straight into the water supply.
Related posts:
- Greener Under Twenty: Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs Here’s our first Greener Under Twenty tip: convert some of...
- Green Life Project: Switch to Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs [caption id="attachment_1066" align="alignleft" width="227" caption="Compact fluorescent light bulbs can save...
- How to Recycle CFLs to Avoid Dumping Mercury How do I recycle my CFL Light Bulb? My...
December 3rd, 2009 at 10:38 am
Any information on your sources though?
June 24th, 2010 at 12:32 am
dispenses utilize a fantastic web-site decent Gives bless you for the effort to help people New from Danny | Thermal Scope
December 6th, 2010 at 1:31 am
So what is the it’s because for the lies of other folks lie, particularly for the very souls who care approximately you? Lie ceaselessly inspired through quite a few of the following parts: Lie not punishment is incessantly used to avoid rejection or bad or dangerous feelings. In case your spouse or romantic partner reacted badly truth, other people regularly try to cover or duvet the truth. Human nature was once once to avoid unhealthy and punishment, although the oldsters to mislead do so.
March 25th, 2011 at 8:29 am
Whatever about manufacture issues,
CFLs (and LEDs) certainly have their advantages too -
but the “switch all your lights and save lots of money” campaigns are like
saying “Eat only bananas and save lots of money!”
It is a light bulb “ban” that’s coming:
Any light bulb not meeting the energy usage standard is banned.
Yes, energy efficient halogen incandescent replacements are allowed, but
still have some constructional and appearance differences, a whiter
light output etc compared with regular bulbs, apart from
costing much more for the small savings, which is why neither
consumers or governments really like them, since they have been around
for a while now without being sold much.
No light bulbs should be banned:
There is no present or future shortage of energy sources for electricity
justifying telling what paying consumers can use,
especially since the overall USA energy savings from light bulb regulations
are less than 1% anyway,
based on the US Dept of Energy’s own statistics ( http://ceolas.net/#li171x )
-remember the politicians keep including non-incandescent street and
industrial lighting in the usual high US usage percentages quoted.
Much greater, and much more relevant, energy waste savings arise from
effectively organized electricity generation and grid distribution,
and from reducing the unnecessary use of appliances:
rather than from stopping people in their choice of what appliance to use.
.
March 25th, 2011 at 8:31 am
Incidentally, re Mercury and CFL manufacturing etc issues
http://ceolas.net/#li19x
The CFL Mercury Issue
Breakage — Recycling — Dumping — Mining — Manufacturing — Transport — Power Plants
May 28th, 2011 at 10:29 pm
I want i could write the way you do sometimes. I’m definitely going to take tips about the way you write and apply it to my own. Thanks for all your exhausting work!
May 31st, 2011 at 8:22 am
Fantastic website. Lots of useful information here. I am sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And naturally, thanks for your sweat!
November 10th, 2011 at 7:10 pm
Thanks for the good writeup. It in reality was once a enjoyment account it. Look complex to more brought agreeable from you! However, how can we communicate?
December 6th, 2011 at 6:54 am
I’m usually to blogging and i actually respect your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your website and hold checking for brand spanking new information.