Warning: sem_get() [function.sem-get]: failed for key 0x152b: Permission denied in /home1/jepplinm/public_html/envirohumanimpact/wp-content/plugins/wp-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 98
EarthascopeSeries: Product Reviews «
  •  
By Matthew Philip
This entry is part 13 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

“Hi, my name’s Randy, and I just really love beer.”

My name is not actually Randy, but I do in fact really love beer.  So much so that my wife surprised me with a variety pack for my birthday, which happened to include an organic amber ale courtesy of the Clipper City Brewing Company out of Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Now, I’ll admit, I’m no beer connoisseur; however, I know what I like and I know what I don’t.  When I drink a beer, I’m looking for full flavor, texture, and a certain “this is new, unique” that you don’t find just anywhere.  This is perhaps how I could best describe my first swig of Oxford Organic Ales – Amber Ale.  Hold the artificial sweeteners, flavors, and additives–give me an all-natural, 4-ingredient organic beer and I’m a happy man.

That’s right 4 ingredients: water, organic barley malt, hops, and yeast.  The way I see it, this is the way God meant beer to be: straight from the earth, simple, and delicious.   The beer is certified organic by the Maryland Department of Agriculture and by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).

What does the USDA Organic certification mean?  Getting an organic certification (according to Wikipedia) typically means that a product follows the following standards:

  • avoidance of most synthetic chemical inputs (e.g. fertilizer, pesticides, antibiotics, food additives, etc), genetically modified organisms, irradiation, and the use of sewage sludge;
  • use of farmland that has been free from chemicals for a number of years (often, three or more);
  • keeping detailed written production and sales records (audit trail);
  • maintaining strict physical separation of organic products from non-certified products;
  • undergoing periodic on-site inspections.

So if you get a chance to get your hands on one of these killer brewskis, don’t pass it up!  Not to mention you might enjoy it that much more knowing that you’re drinking it the way God intended, all natural Organic!

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 11 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Product Reviewed: 365 Organics Organic Cotton Balls

Place of Purchase: Whole Foods Market

Purchase Price: $2.99 for 100 jumbo cotton balls

Product replaced: Non-organic cotton balls

Ingredients: 100% organic cotton

Use: I use them for cosmetic or first-aid uses, such as applying facial toner or alcohol, when needed.

Results: These are great!  They’re affordable and very soft!  The package says that,

Organic farming helps replenish the soil and protect the quality of our water and air.  Cotton grown without the use of harsh chemicals means cotton balls that are naturally free of harmful chemical residue.  Whitened with hydrogen peroxide, our cotton balls are gentle and absorbent, with a velvety, soft texture that feels wonderful on your skin.

I hate to take a manufacturer’s word for what I can expect, because of the obvious fact that they’re trying to sell you the product.  But what they have to say seems all too true, especially how soft the cotton really is, and the fact that the 365 Organics Cotton Balls are so very large — not the case with many other cotton balls.  Sometimes, I tear them in half because it feels wasteful to use so much cotton, and they are still bigger when torn in half than many of their competitors’ are at full size.

Best of all: Mostly, they’re organic, soft, absorbent, and affordable.  Simply put.

Why try it? Because all you have to do is head to a Whole Foods Market near you and pick them up.  If you don’t live near a Whole Foods market, search out your local natural foods and products store for organic cotton balls, and other products. 

The drawback: As noted above, these cotton balls are big, which is great from a utilitarian perspective, but 365 Organics would do well to cut down the size by one half.  That would put them at about an average standard size and would eliminate waste; as is, there is almost too much cotton in each cotton ball.

EHI There! What green products are you using that you love? What products are you trying to replace? Got an idea for a product you would like to be reviewed? We welcome guest columnists; just contact us!

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 10 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Product Reviewed: President’s Choice Green 2-Ply Toilet Paper

Place of Purchase: Jewel-Osco

Purchase Price: 10 for $10 on sale

Product replaced: Non-green toilet paper, like Charmin, Cottonelle, and Quilted Northern

Ingredients: 100% post-consumer paper.  Clean and sanitary without the addition of chlorine bleach*.  Some of the recycled paper in this product may have been bleached with chlorine when originally manufactured.

Use: For any sensitive area you need to wipe!

Results: It works great!  It isn’t rough.  It didn’t leave dingleberries behind (those are those, uh, crumbs).  This product is as soft as its non-green counterparts, without the use of bleach or other chemicals. I came away from the experience with a clean behind! Yeah, I said “dingleberries,” and, “clean behind”.

Best of all: The product boasts post-consumer product, forming demand for a second-use of this useful fiber product as well as reducing demand for virgin fibers.  It also is a diversion for material that is often slated for landfills.

Why try it? Because it’s far greener than the product you are likely currently using for wiping your behind.  It’s also quite affordable.

The drawback: At 176 sheets per roll, the company would do well to double that amount, in order to get the most from the packaging.  Meaning, more paper would go into less needed plastic packaging.  It would also mean less cardboard used for the inner rolls, because fewer rolls would be used.

EHI There! What green products are you using that you love? What products are you trying to replace? Got an idea for a product you would like to be reviewed? We welcome guest columnists; just contact us!

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 9 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Product Reviewed: Clorox Green Works Natural Toilet Bowl Cleaner

Place of Purchase: I bought mine at Dominick’s.  Sold at most retail supermarkets, including Wal-Mart, Target, Jewel-Osco, and a host of others — usually anywhere you can find other Clorox product, you can also find their new “Green Works” brand products as well.

Purchase Price: $1.99 on sale

Product replaced: Other non-green toilet cleaners, such as Clorox, and other brands.

Ingredients: Filtered water, coconut-based cleaning agent (nonionic surfactant; alkyl polyglucoside), citric acid, lactic acid, essential lemon oil, natural thickener (xanthan gum), blue and yellow colorant.  Contains no phosphorus.  Contains no bleach.

Use: Has that ubiquitous curved head for pouring around the inner upper rim of the toilet, pouring down the sides so that scrubbing results in a squeaky clean toilet bowl.

Results: The simple answer is that it worked very well and that it is a “green” product. Discussion follows:

I was very skeptical of (and still am not completely over that skepticism) the Clorox Green Works line of household detergents.  The brand itself, especially the name, “Clorox,” is synonymous with bleach, which is synonymous with pollution, as one of the worst household and industrial cleaners — it is extremely caustic.

As an anecdote, the cashier at Dominick’s didn’t call it, “Clorox,” but literally asked me to hand her the, “Bleach,” from my shopping basket.

So, is the, “Clorox Green Works,” line green? I don’t know about the line as a whole, as I have not bought and reviewed them all — but I will speak to the relative “greenness,” of this new toilet bowl cleaner here, with hopefully a full commentary/review of the brand once all of the products have been reviewed here on EHI.

Yes, we are willing to say that this product is, “green,” because its ingredients largely appear to be green, through careful search.  Also…

Best of all: It appears to have garnered endorsements from the U.S. EPA for “Safer Chemistry and from the Sierra Club.  It says that it is 99.99% natural, which is great for the product.  It is of course a recyclable bottle, which is nice, if only leading manufacturers would begin making recycling areas more tenable, or having a program by which one could bring a bottle to a store and have them refill it, similar to the manner in which large water containers are refilled at stores.  But that’s a commentary for another post.  The product is rather green.

Because Clorox is carried at so many retailers, it’s ubiquity gives it a distinct advantage over other green product manufacturers in that it already has relationships where it can place its products on shelves rather easily, meaning that most retailers can and will carry this line of products, and you don’t have to go to a Whole Foods or other such store to purchase this type of product.  So green cleaning products are being introduced to the masses and are therefore easier to purchase and use.

Why try it?  It’s green, it works, and it is both affordable and available at most retailers.

The drawback: The unneeded blue and yellow colorant.  We could do without them because it adds nothing useful to the product’s utilitarian purpose and is likely a polluting agent.

EHI There! What green products are you using that you love? What products are you trying to replace? Got an idea for a product you would like to be reviewed? We welcome guest columnists; just contact us!

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 8 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Check out Green Life Project: Purchase Metal Water Bottle

As the average American consumer has moved from drinking so much soda on-the-go to drinking more water, a new problem has emerged: what is to be done with all of the water bottles, once theya re empty?  Well, recycling is one option, although the process of making and recycling bottles (as well as transporting full bottles from factory to user) is highly energy- and fossil fuel-intensive, as well, so many have found another viable option.

How have consumers reacted to the negative environmental effects of rampant one-use bottle use? They have adapted and bought in droves different reusable bottles for refilling in their homes.  Many users choose to use a filter and bottle their own water daily and tote it along with them.  A reusable bottle tends to cost between $6 and $20, depending upon size and brand, so pretty quickly, the initial purchase of the reusable bottle is recouped because the user is no longer buying large cases of water at the store or using vending machines for water needs.  But are reusable plastic bottles safe?

So, is there a lingering danger in all of this? Well, while new bottles are available now, most Nalgene bottles were originally a polycarbonate blend of plastics and polymers.  Ever used a Nalgene reusable water bottle?  I have.  I received one years ago from my University as a gift for some volunteer work and have a new one sitting on my shelf.  Originally, it was great to have and I loved it.  I brought my water with me to class and after graduating, still used it for daily water needs.  These typically run from $8 to $15, depending upon shape and size and place of purchase.

Something smelled amiss. I admit, when I first received my bottle, I smelled the plastic smell, and it worried me.  I washed the bottle thoroughly, believing that I could wash away whatever chemicals might be present.  It concerned me that perhaps a chemical, or several chemicals in my polycarbonate bottle might leak into my water and be carcinogenic.  I continued to use my bottle, even though the smell would come back after the bottle was closed and when you smell a new Nalgene on the shelf of a store, the smell from inside should be a warning to consumers that something is amiss.  I enjoyed using the bottle, though, because it was reusable and it seemed everyone had one — all of us gleefully poisoning ourselves.

Nalgene hits the news (not in a good way). When I saw a story in late 2007 saying that certain stores in Canada were removing the bottles from their stores’ shelves, because of strong concerns about the leaching of endocrine interrupters into water, specifically, bisphenol-A (BPA), which is considered, “toxic,” to humans, I decided to never use my Nalgene bottle for water consumption again.  As recently as April 18, 2008, Wal-Mart decided to remove all baby bottles and Nalgene water bottles containing BPA in both the U.S. and Canada!

While Nalgene now sells polyethylene versions of their products (softer, and less durable than the hard polycarbonate ones), I still am not buying.  Increasingly, studies show that foods stored in plastic or those cooked in or with plastic, are showing signs of chemical residues from those materials, and it never seems to be good news, always seems to be warning of carcinogenic properties (think about melted plastic wrap covering your microwaved foods, for example — hint: use bleach-free waxed paper or a paper towel).

Back to the positive envirohuman impact of using Nalgene bottles: Yes, a Nalgene polycarbonate bottle is “green,” in the sense that it is highly durable, lightweight, reusable, and recyclable.  It reduces peoples’ need for bottles of water shipped from far away places (by trucks and boats using such fuels as diesel and other oil-derived fuels) only to have the containers either thrown away or shipped back off to an energy-intensive recycling process.

The reason I recommend you do not use Nalgene or other plastic bottles: They leach chemicals.  Bisphenol-A has been found to be toxic to humans.  Even for those plastic bottles made of other materials, I am still leary of the potential effects of having my food products in contact with plastic, because research continues to show that chemicals can leach from plastics into what we eat.  Those chemicals are not organic and are potentially toxic, as is the case with Bisphenol-A.  I would rather not take my chances.

There are popular alternatives to Nalgene bottles: Nalgene vs. Sigg Water Bottles. As an aside, my older brother had actually carried a (Switzerland-based) Sigg water bottle, which is a decoratively painted aluminum bottle, lined with brass (and I later found out, lined also with an epoxy).  He had lightly promoted the bottle when he visited, but I had not taken too much more interest than noticing its chic design.

I bought my own Sigg water bottle at Whole Foods for about $20, and though I have my reservations about the epoxy lining, I feel safer knowing that laboratory studies say that there is zero leaching from Sigg bottles, whereas lab studies show much leaching from Nalgene’s polycarbonate water bottles.

I should try to find a bottle that is not epoxy-lined, either.  My Sigg water bottle has such a liner, and though the company is not revealing the proprietary blend of chemicals used, they continue to say that there is no leaching of dangerous chemicals.

CEO of Sigg, Steve Wasik, said on treehugger, “very thorough migration testing in laboratories around the world is conducted regularly and has consistently shown SIGG aluminum bottles to have no presence of lead, phthalates, Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), Bysphenol A (BPA), Bysphenol B (BPB) or any other chemicals which scientists have deemed as potentially harmful.”

Nalgene has responded to concerns over BPA. While Nalgene says on its site that it is now using, “Tritan” plastic, which is supposed to be BPA-free, who is to say that it is safe for humans?  It is yet another unproven plastic, and much caution is needed when humans are using plastic to store foods and beverages, like water.  At least Nalgene says that it is phasing out its BPA-leaching plastic products, and they are introducing stainless steel options, alongside several plastic ones.

Remember, our objects have an end-of-life.  The polycarbonate bottles of millions of customers will someday either be recycled or thrown away.  I can’t help but feel that the fewer plastics we have to deal with, overall, the better, not because metals are all that much easier to deal with, but simply because plastics seem to be more toxic to our environment and its inhabitants.  Generally, the smaller the concentration of plastics, the better, it seems.

EnviroHumanImpact gives Nalgene plastic bottles of all types, especially the polycarbonate ones, a negative envirohuman impact rating, because of the direct negative impact on human health and potential diseases from the chemicals leached from the bottles into users’ water cancels out the potential environmental savings from the use of a reusable bottle.  There are other, healthier reusuable water bottle options, like stainless steel, glass, or perhaps Sigg water bottles.

Hi!  Tell us what kind of water bottle you use, why you use it, and what concerns you have about water bottles!

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 7 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Seventh Generation Natural Laundry DetergentProduct Reviewed: Seventh Generation Natural Laundry Detergent with non-chlorine bleach: “Free & Clear” of perfumes and dyes

Place of Purchase: Whole Foods and other stores

Purchase Price: About $11.00 (for 42 loads worth of laundry detergent)

Product replaced: Purex Liquid laundry detergent

Ingredients: “We disclose all ingredients: water softeners and alkalinity builders (sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium citrate, sodium silicate, and zeolites), Coconut and corn-derived cleaning agents (fatty alcohol ethoxylate and polyglucose), Performance enhancers (magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate), Non-chlorine bleach (sodium percarbonate), antiredeposition agents (carboxymethyl inulin and carboxymethyl cellulose), Enzymes (protease, amylase, and cellulase), and Plant-derived anti-foaming agents (oleic acid and glycerol monooleate).

Use: Because this is laundry detergent, I use it on my laundry!  Big surprise there! 

Results:

By Matthew Philip
This entry is part 6 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Method Foaming Hand Wash SoapProduct Reviewed: Method Foaming Hand Wash Soap

Place of Purchase: Bed Bath and Beyond, but also found at most major retailers (ie. Target, Jewel, Pick ‘N Save etc.)

Purchase Price: About $4

Product replaced: SoftSoap, Dial, various petroleum-based hand soaps

Ingredients: (Direct from the bottle) Water, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, Cocamide DEA, Cocamidopropyl Betane, Glycerine, Aloe Barbadensis Gel, Tocopheryl Acetate, Citric Acid, Sodium Chloride, Sodium Citrate, Benzophenone-4, Methychloroisothiazolinone, Methylisothiazolinone, Parfum, Yellow 10, Green 5

Use: General hand washing in the kitchen and bathroom. I’ve been using two different bottles of the Method Foaming Hand Wash, each with different scents, for about the last 2 months. I’ve been exceptionally pleased with a few aspects of the product.

  • The Good:
By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 5 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Product Reviewed: Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps: 18-in-1 Hemp Unscented Baby-Mild Pure Castile Soap Made with Organic Oils

Place of Purchase: Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, others

Purchase Price: $8-$12, depending upon sales for 32 Fl. Oz. Or, about $14.50 at Dr.Bronner.com

Product replaced: Variety of all-purpose detergents, especially Pine-Sol, which I previously used on floors

Ingredients: Water, Saponified Organic Coconut* & Organic Olive* Oils (w/ Retained Glycerin), Organic Hemp Oil, Organic Jojoba Oil, Citric Acid, Vitamin E

* Certified Fair Trade Ingredients

Use: Good, mild detergent for use when you’re scrubbing floors, wiping surfaces, etc. Use for most cleaning applications. Actually, it’s labeled, “no detergents,” let’s call it like they do: it’s soap!

Can also be used to clean one’s body and face.

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 1 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

Product Reviewed: Seventh Generation “Free and Clear” Natural Dish Liquid (hand wash dish soap)

Place of Purchase:Jewel-Osco, also found at Whole Foods and other retailers

Purchase Price: About $4

Product replaced: I’ve been trying different environmentally friendly dish soaps for over a year now. Seventh Generation is one of many I am trying to replace my former, non-green dish soap, Palmolive

Ingredients:A unique combination of naturally derived cleansing agents (coconut-based surfactants), Preservatives (less than 0.05%), Water.

Use: I use it to wash my dishes by hand.

Results: I enjoy using this soap, because it cuts grease and is “free and clear,” of perfumes and dyes. It suds better than almost all of the other natural dish soaps I have tried out, but does not get as sudsy as Palmolive or Dawn.

By Wesley Joseph
This entry is part 2 of 11 in the series Product Reviews

These are our product reviews of greener products and are part of my own journey toward a more sustainable lifestyle. I’ll provide you with the straight-up truth about these products’ worth and usability.

No, I don’t consider myself to be, “green,” quite yet, but I’m changing my habits and products and I want to share the products I’ve tried that get the job done (sometimes even better than their non-green counterparts). This will help you to try greener products with confidence.

EHI There! What green products are you using that you love? What products are you trying to replace? Got an idea for a product you would like to be reviewed?